You noticed something but you can’t prove it. Upload your conversation — we’ll count all of it, read it and tell you what’s there.
Don’t trim the conversation — upload all of it. Finding the parts that matter is our job. A repeat only shows up over time.
Up to 20 MB · 150,000 messages · .txt only · one-to-one chats only
Not sure how to export?
This is what the file we need looks like:
12.03.2026 21:14 - Alex: are we still meeting tomorrow?
12.03.2026 21:16 - Sam: yeah, what time works?
Note: we can only read one-to-one conversations — group chats aren't supported yet.
A message came late and you read the gap. The tone shifted, and you caught it. Then you asked yourself the usual question: am I making this up?
It’s hard to explain to anyone, because saying it out loud shrinks it. “They replied late” sounds ridiculous next to what you actually felt.
Maybe you are overthinking.
Maybe your read was right and nobody ever confirmed it.
Both are possible — and both are written into the conversation.
We read it the way you can’t: by counting. And we tell you what came out, without dressing it up.
You upload the chat. No account to make.
We count every message and read closely — in long chats, an excerpt spread across the whole period. Who moves closer, who pulls back, which subject keeps returning, what happens after a rupture.
You get a report that tells your story. Not a dashboard, not a score — something to read.
Some arguments don’t happen just once. The subject changes; the order doesn’t:
From inside, each one feels new. From outside, it’s the sixth run of the same argument — and we can count them. We won’t tell you who was right; that was never the point.
There are better questions — and your conversation can answer them:
Who do I become around them?
Who do they become around me?
And what has formed between us?
Every relationship — a partner, an ex, someone you’re seeing, your closest friend — has two people in it. But there’s a third thing: what has built up between you over time. That’s what we read.
Behind it: When we read your conversation we borrow questions from a few ways of looking at relationships: Gottman, transactional analysis and Jung. None of those names appear in your report. The report doesn’t explain theory; it tells you what happens in your conversation.
The chapter titles come from your conversation, so they’re different every time. But these four questions get answered in every report — and if the conversation holds no trace of an answer, we say so plainly:
There are two people in that chat and the second one isn’t here. So the report never passes judgement on them — it only describes what happens between you.